Talk:Exoduster
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
I am going to change this from a redirect to African American history to a link there. In the next little while I will develop it into an article of its own (initially a stub). It's wrong to try to lump all of African American history into a single page (we certainly wouldn't try to lump in every predominantly-white-involved American historical article into a single article), and the Exodusters represent a historical event that deserve an independant article. Furthermore, according to the wikipedia article on Black Canadians there may be a Canadian connection as well, so a redirect to African American history would be even more wrong if I can confirm that.
What's more, while the word "Exoduster" ought to be in the wikictionary, this merits a real article in wikipedia.
- Yes, please absolutely write an article on Exodusters. Even a short article of a few sentences will do. However, in the meantime, it's better to keep the page as a redirect. - Nat Krause 7 July 2005 04:37 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Exoduster page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Exoduster" page.
