Talk:Amicus (trade union)

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Article Of The Day for September 21.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus --liquidGhoul 10:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amicus → Amicus (trade union) followed by Amicus (disambiguation) → Amicus … Rationale: I'm just passing through here but as "Amicus" relates to six different articles I think it makes sense to have Amicus lead directly to the disambiguation page, rather than an article about the British trade union. --172.145.66.250 21:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Oppose - The "what links here" function indicates that Amicus is the primary topic. --Muchness 09:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Biggest private sector?

It is incorrect to call Amicus the "biggest" "private sector" union. Unite is not a private-sector union, but one which organizes most greatly within private industry and this is where most of its membership are based. However, Unite has a large NHS contingent including most NHS biomedical and pathology staff, plus Health Visitors.

Tim Sandle —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.172.126 (talk) 11:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 August 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. (closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 20:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amicus → Amicus (trade union) – A defunct trade union that only lasted for 6 years is not the WP:PTOPIC for "Amicus". See page views for related topics. feminist (talk) 15:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Amicus curiae gets over 24x the views of the trade union but its a PTM, the charity gets less than a 6th of the views. A Google search returns more results for the charity but that's probably because its current. Presumably you are proposing no primary topic (meaning moving Amicus (disambiguation) to the base name) which I think makes sense. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and move dab page to base name. Far greater reader interest in Amicus Productions which sources often refer to as just "Amicus": [1], [2]. PC78 (talk) 20:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support, no clear primary topic. —Xezbeth (talk) 15:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looking at source links to Amicus, a lot of them are mis-targeted (usually with the actual intended target being Amicus curiae), which is another good piece of evidence that this should not be ptopic. Colin M (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.