Talk:Sterling, Massachusetts

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sterling, Massachusetts article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Complaint

Just found this sentence in the history section - "Home to the most B.A. mofo's this side of the Misssissippi." This kind of language is utterly disgraceful !! Who put this in here ?? Chaotic.shifter (talk) 06:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The local barber is among the notable residents ?? Chaotic.shifter (talk) 07:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot tell who it was, merely an anonymous person at at IP address. But it does not matter. Those of us who care look askance at any changes made anonymously. Genuine editors proudly sign their work. Most of us try not to get caught up in edit wars.

Next time don't complain, but simply be bold and edit in a correction, as I did. (I reverted to a known good version.) If your correction is somehow broken, do not worry. Someone else will fix it! Thank you for caring. Snezzy (talk) 23:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone please let me know why my updates keep getting rejected? Veevedlab (talk) 19:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)VeevedlabVeevedlab (talk) 19:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is against Wikipedia's policy to link to a blog that is not run by the organization it is about. Thewikipopo (talk) 04:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Utilities neutrality

I'm new here but the words "reap the benefits" and "exceptional" don't sound very neutral to me. Any thoughts? If not I will fix them Thriftycat (talk) 16:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They have been removed. Thriftycat (talk) 00:34, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2013 "natural gas company" verification

I have been unable to locate any record of a plan for public natural gas service in the town. I have added sourced information about Eversource service. Is there a consensus that the unsourced text can be removed? Thriftycat (talk) 00:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, no one is responding so I removed them. Thriftycat (talk) 12:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]