Talk:Ferrari 360
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Ferrari 360 GTC page were merged into Ferrari 360 on March 22, 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Shouldn't links
[edit]Shouldn't links to Ferrari 360 Modena, Ferrari 360 Spider and Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale be removed as they are in this article. If any other links point towards those the should be redirected to just Ferrari 360. Also does anybody have any pictures of the 360 as it is needed
Mark alec 06:04, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Pictures
[edit]I added three pictures of a 360 that I took a couple years ago. I put them in the public domain.
Deane 21:10, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)
Ferrari 360 Modena GTC
[edit]How about give the 360 Modena GTC a mention as it seems to regularly arrear in GT races a lot these days Willirennen 19.27 05 April 2006 (utc)
Why....
[edit]...do we need 7 pictures for one car? Can't we just have front/rear views of a few variations of the 360?
Considering that the 360 was built in Modena, Spider, CS, and GT-C variants (excluding the Challenge version), front/rear views of the few variants would comprise 8 pictures. So... your point is? P924 CarreraGTS (talk) 15:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Metric and typos
[edit]Corrected a lot of typos and make a lot of units consistant. Also removed all the commas on the numbers as numbers should not be spaced with a comma. Wiki editors need to understand how to write out units. Kg and mp/h for example are unacceptable
External Link
[edit]Hi i have currently made a new exotic car site here. I was wanting to add the relevant pages to relevant wiki pages and wondering if thats ok to do so? Please let me know.
Thanks
Richard
Naming
[edit]I'm kind of interested to know what Ferrari was doing here.... they put in an "F" for the F355, F40, F50, F60 (Enzo), and F430. So why isn't 360 "F360"? Is this article inappropriately named, or was the car line inconsistently named? Chaparral2J (talk) 09:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- It went 308, 328, 348, F355, 360, F430. So perhaps the F355 and F430 were the inconsistently named ones? The F40 and F50 were not in the same line of cars so I don't think they are relevant. I wouldn't call the Enzo an F60, as it was 4 years prior to the 60th anniversary of Ferrari. swaq 16:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, what is it with Ferrari and names? They've come out with a new model of the F430 that they call the 430 Scuderia, NOT the F430 Scuderia. Chaparral2J (talk) 03:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
"Spider is the Italian phonetic spelling of the English word "speeder". So, "spider" spoken by an Italian native speaker would sound like "speeder" spoken by an English speaker. 220.235.226.215 (talk) 12:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
360 Modena vs. F355
[edit]360 modena's engine: eliminate 5-valve
F355's engine: using 5-valve
Nagara373 (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Merge discussion
[edit]- Agree The 360GT article is very brief (and needs citations!), just merge it into a separate section here. -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 11:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Took Action It's been done. P924 CarreraGTS (talk) 23:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ferrari 360. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070831120402/http://www.natsoft.com.au/cgi-bin/results.cgi?23%2F11%2F2003.MOUN to http://www.natsoft.com.au/cgi-bin/results.cgi?23%2F11%2F2003.MOUN
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)