User talk:Dsmdgold

Archives:

Need further explanation

Good day Mr. Dsmdgold

Do you have anything against me? Why did you delete my article? Can you please explain it more. I have written my position of not to delete my article. Did you find time to read it? Did you ever think of the sacrifices I am trying to make to contribute to this site? I know of some rules in making an article and writing an article about an organization has a big chance of being deleted. But why are there lots of articles like mine that I can read everyday in this same site? Jhei ann (talk) 04:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks^_^

Ok, thank you. I understand it now. I was just unhappy because I did the article twice. Anyway, more power to your site.Jhei ann (talk) 00:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks^_^

Ok, thank you. I understand it now. I was just unhappy because I did the article twice. Anyway, more power to your site.Jhei ann (talk) 00:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi I can see what you mean now and can see that next time i come accross any artcile that im not sure about i will have to do some research before diving straight for the speedy deletion notices.=] Dewster (talk) 16:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lyman Hine

Yeah, I saw that. I've instead tagged it with some suggestions for improvement: sourcing, categories, cites needed, etc. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genealogy

You wrote:

Hello Harrisonlatour, I can see that you may be upset with some of the changes I made in the V.R. Coss House article, and with the nomination of several article you started for deletion, and the speedy deletion of several others. I think that perhaps we have arrived here because of misunderstanding of what we are doing at Wikipedia. We are building an encyclopedia. We are not building a genealogical database or a depository of family stories.

LaTour wrote:

Then why does wikipedia have a category for genealogy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Genealogy

Category:Genealogy

DarkSun

On the band's official website says that they have worked with many important bands like: Primal Fear, Sinner, Rage, Angra... Also says that their album El Lado Oscuro had a great acceptance by the public and was named one of the best Spanish heavy metal albums of the year, they have releasedn 3 studio albums in 5 or 6 years and they are recordind their 4th one DarkSun Website, They wouldn't lie on their website. If this is not important tell me what is then. Iknow you wanted to save the article and that what I'm here for, to ask for your help to save the article and talk about it in the article's entry, please I really need your help. Thanks. Rockk3r (talk 18:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They do have a major record label from Germany, but it's not on wikipedia either. Now I'm getting crazy haha. Rockk3r (talk 22:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harrisonlatour can't stop himself

Hi. Have a look at Harrisonlatour's recent edits. I gave a vandalism4im warning. andy (talk) 23:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bank of Hominy pic etc

Neat that you happened to have a pic of Bank of Hominy ready to upload instantly, whenever someone might start an article on it... :) Thanks also for further improving the Oklahoma skyscrapers and other articles that I worked on earlier today. Hopefully my contributions were helpful, overall, in dealing with the situation, the full scope of which was unclear to me at first. And at least it's nice to get these bank and skyscraper articles started, i think they're neat. Cheers, doncram (talk) 01:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got your message back. About getting the MPS listings, I myself cannot access them by searching from my own PC, i have to use Microsoft Internet Explorer on another PC, then search on "National Register MPS" to get to the search page, then search and write down the URL of interest. I appreciate your view on defending against a bad precedent; I count myself privileged to be in the position of developing articles on NRHPs in a free and leisurely manner, while a foray into another area of wikipedia was just frustrating due to the AfD mechanism being put into play. Thank you, really, for what u did.

About Bank of Hominy, the pic is great to have, but the fact that the MPS is about how the 4 banks are Richardsonian Romanesque in style then gives me pause. Having contemplated Richardson's masterpiece Buffalo State Hospital a lot while working on List of NHLs in New York (and not sure if i started its article or not, too), I understand the style is largely about having interestingly large masses (although perhaps also conveying solidity through brickwork, i am not sure if that is part of the style). But then, how can a 2 story building that is perhaps rather plain in overall shaping be part of that style? I wonder, do you have or could you go back and take more pictures, from farther back to see the whole building and any massings, and closer on details. I can somewhat see that it is brick and has potentially romanesque round arches as a motif around the top. But more photographical investigation and explanation would be nice. Perhaps they are really nice closeup and comparable to the "Jewel box" bank buildings by Louis Sullivan in small towns in Wisconsin and elsewhere, I wonder?

e.g. National Farmer's Bank of Owatonna--Appraiser (talk) 20:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder further, do you have pics for any of the 20 NHLs on List of National Historic Landmarks in Oklahoma? One NHL pic is worth 10,000 words, perhaps. :) Cheers, doncram (talk) 04:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jesse Bushyhead

I have nominated Jesse Bushyhead, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Bushyhead. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gary King (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding db-g3 template

I recently tagged the Jeff Stanis article with the db-g3 template which you declined. That's fine, but my question is, did I use the correct db template? The article is obviously entirely made up and doesn't warrant sticking around Wikipedia for 5 days, in my opinion. Is there another method to delete it ASAP? Thanks. — X96lee15 (talk) 05:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the "speedy" tag from Veriflora

The article is really about the Veriflora organization, and I feel that the organization qualifies under that part of A7, as a group. If you concur, please restore the tag. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keir Stahlsmith

Hi there. Can you salt the page, or perhaps let the author recreate it once more and then salt it? Either way; the author doesn't seem to catch on yet. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's BA-A-A-A-A-ACK!!! Please salt? - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LOTD

Congratulations. List of Kansas birds was received support at WP:LOTD and will be recognized as list of the day. If you have any date preferences get back to me by the 26th.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 02:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Intervention Needed

Based on what I have seen from my Watchlist, two editors with whom you have prior experience dealing with, User:Andyjsmith and User:Harrisonlatour have been involved in a dispute over the Ed Edmondson article, which has culminated in User:Harrisonlatour suggesting on the article's Talk page that he would like to see the article protected from editing. As I said in my comments there, I think such a request is overblown under the circumstances. I have also discussed this matter with User:Andyjsmith who told me on his Talk page, that making such overblown requests seems to be User:Harrisonlatour's solution for dealing with problems on Wikipedia. --TommyBoy (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You know this guy Harrisonlatour. I'm not concerned about his request for page protection - if you look at his contribs he does it pretty often whenever he's reverted and I can't see that any admin would take it seriously.

What's more important is that he seems utterly incapable of learning how to use WP. I'm not the only one who reverts him by any means but just look at his talk page - it's gone beyond silly. Mostly he's just dumping rubbish from his personal archive into vaguely relevant articles. Sometimes the relevance is only word association. But he's also been making politically motivated edits and can't understand what's wrong with that. IMHO he has a genuine problem working out what WP is. Lots of editors have explained it slowly and clearly and the message obviously isn't getting through. With the best will in the world I just don't think he's capable of improving.

andy (talk) 21:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Here's a weird one for you

First off, I regret the six month latency in my reply. I triage and action input in as timely a fashion as is possible, on and off-wiki, with times running between 30 seconds and 18 months as of this writing.

live fire test

end live-fire test

If your talk page does not become an attack page, then at the time of your writing the above method for neutering & sanitizing human/machine readable templates into strictly human-readable ones had perhaps gone on walkabout for a bit.

If your talk page does become an attack page, the above sanitation method is dead, and I urge you to maintain a safe distance from your now-dangerous talk page.

Hope this helps! <3

—Adrian~enwiki (talk) 2008-02-27 20:17Z

Featured article review for Book of Kells

Book of Kells has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds March 2008 Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dsmdgold/Tulsa architecture

The article isn't done, but it's plenty good enough (in my opinion) to go into mainspace - why don't you move it? -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LOTD

List of Florida birds has been selected as a list of the Day for the month of April. Let me know if you have any strong date preferences before March 26th. Since it placed in the top 5 it will be recognized on two days during the month.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 07:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds April 2008 Newsletter

The April 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

question

Hi again and good day!

I want to report something and I hope you can do the right action to this. Well, I have seen an article here that is about an organization and to tell you the truth, we know this organization. Well, for everybody's information, that organization was a total copy of another organization which was deleted early this year. Constitutions, articles, and the format were patterned to the said organization. And I have seen that this site is becoming biased. I can't understand. Can you please enlighten me.203.82.35.253 (talk) 00:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjet Birds May 2008 Newsletter

The May 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retro Uprising

Hi! You deleted the article of Retro Uprising. Why isn't this article important enough? I mean, on this website, people can play old video games from their childhood-time. Volkov ^talk 16:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds June 2008 Newsletter

The June 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 13:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008 Birds Project Newsletter Link

The October 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. --Addbot (talk) 16:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds August newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 00:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds October newsletter

The October 2008 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds November newsletter

The October 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

WikiProject Birds February newsletter

The February 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 21:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds March newsletter

The March 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds April newsletter

The April 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 15:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Codex ephremi.jpg

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds May newsletter

The May 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 06:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds June newsletter

The June 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dsmdgold/Sandbox6

Seeing your complete list of Oklahoma NRHP sites in your sandbox, I wanted to let you know that the state's listings have been upgraded significantly. Each county has its own tableised list article, and many have pictures. They're accessible at National Register of Historic Places listings in Oklahoma. Nyttend (talk) 13:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds August newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Newsletter delivery by –xeno ^talk 02:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)

Nice..

... to see you back on the watchlist! How's it going? Johnbod (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

	The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
	Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue \| Next issue

Content

The community is currently

deciding whether

60,000

articles should be deleted.

background

WIKIPROJECT OKLAHOMA

This has been sent to you requesting that you respond to whether your not you are an active member of WP:OK Please respond Here. By following the instructions there.

--Steam Iron 22:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Upload without copyright

You seem to have forgotten to add a copyright tag to File:MaryAndMurrayLooneyEducationAndResearchCenter.JPG that you uploaded recently. If you add a valid free licence tag it will not be deleted. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 06:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The template by which I added the file clearly states that"I (Dsmdgold (talk)) created this work entirely by myself." This is a copyright claim. I made it. I own the copyright. The from for submitting says "You irrevocably agree to release your contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. " I do so agree. There is no need for any other tag. Dsmdgold (talk) 17:34, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AugsutineGospelsFolio125rPassionScenes.jpg needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:AugsutineGospelsFolio125rPassionScenes.jpg is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) , or if such information is provided it is confusing.

Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image.

If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer.

If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the {{own}} template on the media information page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:VirgiliusRomanusFol14rVergilPortrait.gif needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:VirgiliusRomanusFol14rVergilPortrait.gif is missing information as to its authorship (and or source) , or if such information is provided it is confusing.

Although images may not need author information in un-controversial cases, or where an applicable source is provided, such information aids those making use of the image, and helps verify the copyright status of an image.

If possible, please consider updating the media information page to make the authorship (and or source) of this media clearer.

If the media is your own work, please consider explicitly including your user name or using the {{own}} template on the media information page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:31, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We're recruiting art lovers!

Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the Smithsonian Archives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participate here, and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:William IX of Aquitaine - BN MS fr 12473.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:William IX of Aquitaine - BN MS fr 12473.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wallerstein 219.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Wallerstein 219.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesPlant.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesPlant.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:39, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesPimpernel.gif

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesPimpernel.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesFolio6vDonorPortrait.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesFolio6vDonorPortrait.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesFolio5vAuthorPortrait.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesFolio5vAuthorPortrait.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesFolio3v7Physicians.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesFolio3v7Physicians.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesFolio148vViolet.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesFolio148vViolet.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesEndpaperPeacock.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesEndpaperPeacock.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesCoral.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesCoral.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesBirds.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesBirds.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ViennaDioscoridesAuthorPortrait.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ViennaDioscoridesAuthorPortrait.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nicopol final battle 1398.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Nicopol final battle 1398.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MSU Interview

Dear Dsmdgold,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 23:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover \| Feature \| News and announcements \| Humor \| Want ads
To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 01:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 00:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regards, — Moe Epsilon 00:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 20:57, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MBisanz ^talk 05:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 02:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol028vPortMatt.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol028vPortMatt.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol124rTuncCrucixerant.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol124rTuncCrucixerant.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol129v4EvangelistSymbols.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol129v4EvangelistSymbols.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AachenGospelsFourEvangelistsPage.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:AachenGospelsFourEvangelistsPage.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:00, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol188rQuoniam.gif

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol188rQuoniam.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol183vTextMark15.gif

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol183vTextMark15.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol183rEratAutem.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol183rEratAutem.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol130rIncipitMark.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol130rIncipitMark.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cpg339 135r.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Cpg339 135r.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cpg359 46v.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Cpg359 46v.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:David and Jonathan.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:David and Jonathan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol114vTuncDicit.gif

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol114vTuncDicit.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol040vBeatitudes.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol040vBeatitudes.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol008rBrevCausMatt.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol008rBrevCausMatt.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol003rCanonTable.GIF

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol003rCanonTable.GIF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DurhamCassiodorusDavidVictor.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:DurhamCassiodorusDavidVictor.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KellsFol034rChiRhoMonogram.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KellsFol034rChiRhoMonogram.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COd

Why did you delete the wiki for Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent16945 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Aurora-heramphrodites.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Aurora-heramphrodites.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lionel Sosa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Republican, Coors and Lanier High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FLRC for List of birds of Oklahoma

I have nominated List of birds of Oklahoma for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Harrias ^talk 09:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:AachenGospelsFourEvangelistsPage.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AachenGospelsFourEvangelistsPage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hampton11235 (talk) 01:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Featured list removal candidates

I have nominated List of birds of Florida for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

I have nominated List of birds of Kansas for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Harrias ^talk 14:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CathachColumbaText.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CathachColumbaText.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gladiatoria 113.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gladiatoria 113.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dsmdgold. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dsmdgold. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dsmdgold. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Richard the Marshal (image attributed to William)

Reposted in main talk page:
In my retirement, I pursued my DNA which showed 63% Great Britain. This did not differentiate between Anglo-Saxon and Norman ancestry, so I revived my interest in Medieval History, making a whole month of one page vignettes of historic personages featuring Commons images which I edited to fit the background color. My text checked original sources where possible. Your name entered at some point File:Matthew Paris - William Marshal.jpg. This Matthew of Paris artwork depicts Richard Marshal jousting in battle with Baldwin. William 1st Earl and 2nd Earl of Pembroke were already dead in 1233. Could the scan of Four Gothic Kings by Hallam be the source of the error? - Athrash | ^Talk 19:11, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, for your response. I was seeking someone on Wikipedia who had access to Four Gothic Kings by Hallam. There were maybe nine editions, first American edition (Weidenfeld and Nicolson) in 1987. Question would be what is the caption and page number of Richard Marshal battle scene. If in error I think Hallam should rectify the situation if she is still active, it has reverberations on the William the Marshal pages. I don't need another heavy coffee table book and the closest library is 88 miles away at Southern Miss, but still curious how the details evolved and she should have access to the National Archives in Britain. On archive.org, The art of Matthew Paris in the Chronica majora by Suzanne Lewis (copyrighted) cites illustration? on p. 449 inverted shield at death of William, fol. 54 [58] which could be substituted? for File:Matthew Paris - William Marshal.jpg and she also states on p. 232 that Matthew romanticized the Richard Marshal skirmish with Baldwin. Hallam has a Wikipedia page as Elizabeth Hallam-Smith, but doesn't list Four Gothic Kings under published works. - Athrash | ^Talk 20:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting and Richard the Marshal has no depiction on his Wikipedia page, now we know why. - Athrash | ^Talk 00:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons images state that file cannot be overwritten, even when erratum? - Athrash | ^Talk 00:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FPC notification

A featured picture nominated by you in 2005 is currently nominated for delist. You can find the delist nomination at this link. Bammesk (talk) 01:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Kamala

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Kamala. 122.171.171.13 (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:DanielFreemanHomesteadApplication.jpg

The file File:DanielFreemanHomesteadApplication.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obseleted by c:File:Daniel Freeman Homestead Application.jpg at commons which is a color and higher quality photograph.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:AshburnPenatuchtFol6rAdamEve.jpg

The file File:AshburnPenatuchtFol6rAdamEve.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by higher quality File:AshburnPenatuchtFolio006rCainAbel.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:VergiliusRomanusFolio44v.gif

The file File:VergiliusRomanusFolio44v.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by File:Vergilius rom 44v.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:03, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]