Talk:Hamilton County, Texas

United States: Texas / U.S. counties Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

How to

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

Timeline History

Before anyone arbitrarily deletes large chunks of the history, please discuss. The timeline was designed as is, to help the global community understand how the timeline of the county history fits into the larger whole of Texas history. To do otherwise takes a very myopic view. Hamilton County has never existed in a vacuum. Maile66 (talk) 18:20, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps (and I see you have made similar additions to Guadalupe County, Texas), but Wikipedia geographical articles are not generally written that way. See for example Galveston County, Orange County, Albany County, Colfax County, and in general any county article with a "History" section. In general, only historical items directly pertaining to the article subject are included, anything else being considered irrelevant or outside the scope of the article (which is narrow and specific to one subject). According to WikiProject U.S. counties, the "History" section should contain "Major historical events that occurred in the county". State-wide and nation-wide events outside the county obviously would not meet this criteria. — Loadmaster (talk) 19:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to this more completely here but I'll just make a quick comment. I think there is nothing wrong with providing historical context in the history section for any article and, in fact, believe that is a good thing to do (provided the context does not overwhelm the main topic). Timelines should generally have less context information than prose, though, and should be closer to the main topic. The biggest concern here is that this is not a list article so a detailed timeline like this is not really the best thing to do. A general prose history of the county would be better (with context as appropriate). If the timeline is really important I would say either:

Include it as a table off to the side of the history section (but it would need to be a lot shorter), or
Make a separate article Timeline of the history of Hamilton_County, Texas (probably not appropriate).

--Mcorazao (talk) 21:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the list of events as a past-tense narrative, following the style of other county articles. I retained non-county events that were relevent to Hamilton county, but omitted the ones that were too global in scope. — Loadmaster (talk) 20:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hamilton County, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]