Jump to content

Talk:Heng Fa Chuen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I do trust you

[edit]

Dear editor of the Heng Fa Chuen page:

As a resident of Heng Fa Chuen, I have wittnessed everything from since when the town was built and buildings sprang from the fertile soils. I have wittnessed people flocking into this town in the 1980s after a boom in housing development. I have wittnessed generations after generations of youngsters growing up and leaving the town behind.... as the mayor of Heng Fa Chuen, I hereby exercise my authority of declaring this article valid.

Mayor, Dr. Siu Ching Mou - 69.140.103.233 02:45, April 23, 2005 (UTC)

Number of blocks

[edit]

As far as I remember some numbers are skipped, such as 14 and 24. Does the number of blocks still adds up to fifty? — Instantnood 17:39, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

The number of blocks still adds up to fifty, this I'm definitely sure. I am going to do a survey of the numbers used for naming the blocks this afternoon. (User 69.140.103.233) 2:57, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)- 69.140.103.233 18:59, June 15, 2005 (UTC)
What was the result? 48 or 50? — Instantnood 04:55, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're right. All the blocks totalled up to 48. (68.33.194.218 17:10, 21 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Accuracy

[edit]

To Instantnood:

I have searched on Yahoo! Hong Kong and that was what I got for the information regarding Heng Fa Chuen. How should I cite that? 68.33.210.46 20:34, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is it from a mirror of Wikipedia? Can you put up a link here? Thanks. — Instantnood 18:46, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The pages that once contained the information are now no longer hosted by the server. But I definitely recall that the information is on that page. How should I cite that? 68.33.210.46 16:45, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Any other alternative source? — Instantnood 17:15, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I am definitely sure of the information -- let's leave the information up there -- if later anybody can have any evidence that disproves it, I will be willing to delete the information. 68.33.210.46 20:02, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You'd better move the material here, and request for evidence. — Instantnood 21:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pak Sha Wan

[edit]

On the maps, Pak Sha Wan is small bay near Heng Fa Villa on the northwest corner of Lei Yue Mun Bay (present-day Heng Fa Chuen). You can still find it in centamap. I found that Heng Fa Chuen is on the reclamation of Lei Yue Mun Bay, bounded by Pak Sha Wan and Lo Shue Pai. I am not sure that The area which is now known as Heng Fa Chuen was actually called Pak Sha Wan is true or not. HenryLi 15:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Heng Fa Chuen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Paradise mall" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Paradise mall and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 14#Paradise mall until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 18:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]