Talk:Baan Corporation

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled

Baan is company who is leading in ERP,

When was the Last Time BaaN "LEAD" in ERP???
I think the author meant that many companies have placed investments into BaaN and is still using it to this day.

LN is a very promising product. Having worked with Baan 4 and 5, LN can end up providing Infor with a serious alternative to SAP Do not be surprised if this product takes off.

the spruce goose was a very promising product,we shall see

The main Baan related website is now http://www.baanboard.com

De Uitverkoorne

Perhaps add a reference to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0492916/ Surely, LN ia a much superior product thant Baan IV and Baan V. LN can give competition to SAP.

Sunday policy

From an announcement by Baan President Laurens van der Tang on April 20, 2001:

As mentioned, the general rule is that we don't work on Sunday. Let's define more precisely what this means. It implies among other things the following:

Nobody will be asked to work on Sunday, and everyone has complete freedom to refuse working on Sunday
We don't have any meetings or teleconferences that take place on Sunday
Internal meetings and meetings with customers, prospects and partners are scheduled in such a way that people don't have to travel on Sunday to be able to attend (which typically means starting on Tuesday or late on Monday)
Internal meetings and meetings with customers, prospects and partners are also scheduled in such a way that people can be back at home in time before Sunday (which typically means finishing Thursday or Friday)
Offices are closed on Sunday
We have no customer or prospect hospitality activities on Sunday
We don't participate in external conferences and/or fairs on Sunday
We don't sponsor events that take place on Sunday
No internal IT helpdesk support on Sunday

In some countries, especially Israel, Saturday is the generally accepted public day of rest. For Baan employees in these countries the same rules apply, but now on Saturday.

Johan Lont 10:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Software user comments on the article page.

I found the following comment:

BaaN shipping calendar implemented in 2010 DOES NOT WORK!

This is evidently a user's opinion. Wikipedia is not a user group forum.

I have removed the comment and placed here in the talk section. If anyone wants to verify this statement or add any comments regarding the shipping calendar, please do so, but in a referenced manner according to Wiki priniples. Nick in syd (talk) 16:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Baan Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

? A help request is open: first link works, second link does not. No replacement link found for second link.. Replace the reason with "helped" to mark as answered. Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]