Talk:...Baby One More Time (album)/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about ...Baby One More Time (album). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Untitled
I belive that this page should be moved back to "...Baby One More Time" as this is what the album is offically called and all of the pages link to the redirect page of "...Baby One More Time". Also the single is under the name "...Baby One More Time (single)". Ianblair23 02:14, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Oppose The punctuation is a designer's treatment on the album cover, and not actually part of the title. The song ought to be moved to Baby One More Time (single). —Michael Z. 2005-08-11 21:56 Z
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. violet/riga (t) 21:18, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
14 Million Mark Doesn't Mean 14 Million Copies Sold!
We all know that "Baby One More Time" was certified 14X platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America on July 19, 2004, as we all beleived that it sold 14 million copies or units! But, we're definitely wrong the album sold only 10,534,000 copies respectively. And the other 3,446,000 copies where shipped to retailers.
Clarity
Can somebody clarify (for those of us not Billboard chart wanks) if the sales numbers refer only to Baby, to its several mentioned variants, to the other albums referred to, or what? Trekphiler 06:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Singles section - OVERKILL
This is just way too much. Not only should these images not appear anywhere but on the articles for the singles, but they are way too huge and all of the information shown here should already be in the individual articles for the singles. All of this is absolutely not needed here - it looks like a fansite. - eo 17:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I feel like there should be a section for the singles. I'm guessing that since eo made this comment, somebody completeley removed the singles section. I think it would be very important/helpful to include a section for a short description of the singles of this album.Hpswimmer (talk) 01:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Secret Message?
This looks weird. Is it a troll? If not, I'd like to see a source. "In the very early releases of the album, there is a hidden message after "The Beat Goes On". It had Britney Spears promoting some of the songs from the Backstreet Boys' album Millennium. There is a secret message check it watch here
U.S and Worldwide Sales as of 2009 (UPDATED)
As of July 2009, the album has sold 10,534,000 copies in the U.S. according to Nielsen SoundScan and USA Today News of 2006 with additional 1,600,000 sold at BMG Music Clubs click here However, Nielsen SoundScan does not count albums sold through clubs like the BMG Music Service, which were significantly popular in the 1990's.link
According to the FOX News and the Telegraph.Co.Uk News the album surpassed the 25 million mark. According to "People Magazine" the album had sold 24 million copies worldwide since October 7, 2002. It still stated on her website www.britney.com on her career highlights, "Baby One More Time" sold only 22 million copies worldwide...but the certifications there are false like Mexicos' AMPROFON certification and the Brazilian's ADBP are did not match on its websites..I do not trust this site...please site an reliable source on changing the worldwide sales figure.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Adelbutt123 (talk • contribs) 08:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Professional Reviews and Worldwide Promotion
This article lacks professional reviews, I think its because it was on January 1999. And the promotion is a mess! Britney did a worldwide promotion for "Baby One More Time" like in Japan click here and Hey!Hey!Hey! and at the Festival Bar in Italy click here
More Info for ...Baby One More Time Album
According to the US Billboard Charts. The album spent;
- Billboard 200- stayed 103 weeks, debuted #1 on January 30, 1999.
- Catalog Albums- stayed 19 weeks, debuted #9 on January 20, 2001.
- Canadian Albums Chart- stayed 47 weeks, debuted #1 on January 30, 1999.
The total length of the tracks equals to 42:20 duration on American Editions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adelbutt123 (talk • contribs) 07:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Certification
The album is certified both 14×Platinum and Gold by RIAA. In fact, every album with more than 10 Platinum is automatically certified Diamond. Saying 14×Platinum means it is certified Diamond. Saying Diamond does not mean 14×Platinum. Therefore 14×Platinum should be used in the certification table. --Muhandes (talk) 06:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/retrieve_chart_history.do}}
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-20 21:28:00, 404 Not Found
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-31 04:33:46, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/5939508/page/2
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-20 21:28:00, 404 Not Found
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-31 04:33:58, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 3
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/britneyspears/articles/story/5938512/cover_story_britney_spears
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-20 21:28:00, 404 Not Found
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-31 04:34:09, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 4
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/5939508/page/3
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-20 21:28:00, 404 Not Found
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-31 04:34:17, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 5
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/britneyspears/albums/album/106495/review/6067393/baby_one_more_time
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-20 21:28:00, 404 Not Found
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-31 04:34:28, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 6
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://ca.music.yahoo.com/read/news/12063283}}
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-20 21:28:00, 404 Not Found
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-31 04:34:37, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 7
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.theofficialcharts.com/stats-top_sellers_by_year-singles.php
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-20 21:28:00, 404 Not Found
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-31 04:34:48, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 8
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://mahasz.hu/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=archivum&lista=top40&ev=1999&het=17&submit_=Keresés
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-20 21:28:00, 404 Not Found
- In ...Baby One More Time on 2011-05-31 04:34:59, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
The band did a version of this song first track on their "Go to the Movies" album, should that be mentioned on the article? Govvy (talk) 11:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Rough consensus that the song is the primary topic; it will be moved to this title. Cúchullain t/c 14:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
...Baby One More Time → ...Baby One More Time (album) – The song is as popular as the album... right now. However, I still believe that the song is more popular than the album in Wikipedia because... statistics of album may drop if it is disambiguated. Look at Doctor Zhivago (novel); when it was disambiguated from Doctor Zhivago, the stats drastically declined. Same goes for My Sister's Keeper (novel), renamed from My Sister's Keeper. --George Ho (talk) 21:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support it's pretty obvious that it's the song that's primary, since it's the song that got playtime, not the entire album, and the song video is the thing that generated controversy, along with the lyrics of the song. -- 65.92.180.225 (talk) 23:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support: The song is definitely the primary topic. Unreal7 (talk) 14:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Unsure. This is generally not done, usually, it doesn't matter, the album is the main topic and the song is directed at (song). I'm not convinced. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 22:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- I did not say that "(song)" should be primary. I said that it may be more popular, but you get the idea. --George Ho (talk) 03:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I was under that impression. Than what would ...Baby One More Time be? — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Album should not be primary, so it can be two-disambiguation page for a while until someone proposes that a song be primary. --George Ho (talk) 04:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- If proposal is approved, then we may convert the redirect page Baby One More Time into a disambiguation page and make ...Baby One More Time a redirect. --George Ho (talk) 03:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree with having a two-disambiguation page, as that is usually frowned upon. I think this should be adjusted to include the song, and see what everyone thinks about making the song the primary topic. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 23:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- There are Hit Me, Baby, One More Time and ...Baby One More Time Tour. --George Ho (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- If you want the song to be primary topic, go ahead and then say it. However, I still don't see either as overcoming one another. In fact, real numbers of album could be 400 or 200 per day. --George Ho (talk) 06:29, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'm still unsure about this... You really could argue that the song is the primary topic, but at the same time, the album did sell more than the single did. But I do think something like Dance Again (disambiguation) needs to be done, to cover in the tour and the TV show. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support. Although typically the album is the main topic, I find the proposal to be more useful and clear for the readers. Thankyou. Till 04:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep as it is. The song will always be popular because it is a single, but it would be the same as saying that we should move Oops!... I Did It Again to Oops!... I Did It Again because the song is more notable. Same could be said for Like a Prayer. The song Like a Prayer (song) is more notable than the album, still, the article wasn't moved. There are many other cases such as Like a Virgin, Sound of the Underground, etc. - Saulo Talk to Me 11:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Voice and performance
"Spears possesses a soprano vocal range" statement -
Is this a joke? --Lapadite77 (talk) 03:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ...Baby One More Time (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.infodisc.fr/CDCertif_Album.php?debut=300
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on ...Baby One More Time (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C286184%2C00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.riaa.com/newsitem.php?content_selector=newsandviews&news_month_filter=12&news_year_filter=1999&id=C29FB2E9-763C-3D37-9153-6E3E41FA6DD1&searchterms=britney+diamond&terminclude=&termexact=
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5iXT6jJ9B?url=http%3A%2F%2Fca.music.yahoo.com%2Fread%2Fnews%2F12045573 to http://ca.music.yahoo.com/read/news/12045573
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5jW8qIpnZ?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mi2n.com%2Fpress.php3%3Fpress_nb%3D47877 to http://www.mi2n.com/press.php3?press_nb=47877
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5PkfqxTDF?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rianz.org.nz%2Frianz%2Fchart.asp to http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart.asp
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://australian-charts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Britney+Spears&titel=...Baby+One+More+Time&cat=s
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921075354/http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1626386/director-recalls-making-britney-spears-drive-me-crazy-video.jhtml to http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1626386/director-recalls-making-britney-spears-drive-me-crazy-video.jhtml
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C84970%2C00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C1099891_0_274628_6%2C00.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1999_May_12/ai_54609972/ - Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fe%2Fa%2F1999%2F07%2F30%2FWEEKEND10994.dtl&type=printable
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ...Baby One More Time (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110125223331/http://new.music.yahoo.com/britney-spears/tracks/from-the-bottom-of-my-broken-heart--1486509 to http://new.music.yahoo.com/britney-spears/tracks/from-the-bottom-of-my-broken-heart--1486509
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.music.yahoo.ca/read/news/12050537 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.music.yahoo.ca/read/news/12063283
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC)