Talk:Meitnerium
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Meitnerium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 29, 2004. | |||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Refs
[edit]- http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219633610005840
- http://dx.doi.org/0256-307X/27/6/062502
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1595/147106708X297486
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218301307006411
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.021301
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(93)90529-Q
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2008-10584-7
Half-Life
[edit]The most stable known isotope, meitnerium-278, has a half-life of 7.6 seconds
Except if you look at the table of isotopes in the article, then it is 4 seconds. Or in the German wikipedia, then it is 30 minutes (although they state meitnerium-276 is the most stable isotope). https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meitnerium https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Isotope/7._Periode#109_Meitnerium 77.182.66.75 (talk) 17:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- The half-lives up in this region of the nuclide chart are not known very well. I will look and see which is the latest value, but it may change significantly in the future. Double sharp (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Compounds
[edit]Is MtF6 a Compound?Porygon-Z 21:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porygon-Z474 (talk • contribs)
- It would be, but it hasn't yet been synthesised. Double sharp (talk) 03:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
OK, It's just all too confusing with the "should be, could be, and would be." Porygon-Z 13:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porygon-Z474 (talk • contribs)
Atomic mass of 268 or 278?
[edit]File:Periodic table large.svg presents a atomic mass of (268), but the current version of this article says (278). Is the File incorrect? Mateussf (talk) 13:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- The file is outdated. Based on current data, the most stable known isotope is unambiguously 278Mt. Values are similarly incorrect for several other superheavy elements. Complex/Rational 15:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)