Talk:Social Christian Reformist Party

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

Caribbean: Dominican Republic Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Dominican Republic portal This article is supported by WikiProject Dominican Republic (assessed as Low-importance).

NPOV

I'm not npoving this article because I'm an expert on the dominican republic, because I'm not. I just feel the tone of this article is a bit biased, in a way I can't quantify and am not sure how to correct. I went back and forth about NPOVing but decided to be bold. MDCore 11:33, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

This article definitely has perspective. I think, however, that my statements about Ballaguer and others are very similar to those made in scholarly works about the history and politics of the DR, and in the mainstream DR press.

now we have people NPOVing who are completely unlearned in the subject about which criticize soon people are going to NPOV the claim the 2+2= 4 at least have a REASON to NPOV before start going haywire and disputing everything