Talk:Dirichlet convolution

[Untitled]

Explain why its a Dirichlet ring, and not a field_(mathematics). Naively, it seems to have additive and multiplicative units and inverses. linas 05:00, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Because only arithmetic functions for which f(1) is not 0 have inverses. I have clarified this in the article. Gandalf61 10:25, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Weak multiplicative functions

Where do these come from? Are they the same as multiplicative (in the number-theoretic sense)? Richard Pinch (talk) 21:45, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it looks like it just means multiplicative. The results proved in that section is that (f*g)(mn)=(f*g)(m)·(f*g)(n) for relatively prime integers m,n, which is just the definition of multiplicative. A google search for "weak multiplicative functions" returned essentially 2 results (one of which was this wiki article), so I'm removing the term weak. RobHar (talk) 23:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I decided to just remove the whole section, as it was poorly written, it reiterates a statement made in the previous section, and the proof is already in the article Multiplicative functions. RobHar (talk) 00:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sorting that out. Richard Pinch (talk) 07:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Special case of general convolution concept

The article says, correctly, that the Dirichlet convolution is analogous to the ordinary convolution of functions on the reals. But it seems to me that one can say more than that, namely, both are special cases of the same concept, convolution on a monoid. (Going a bit farther than the usual case of groups, which is discussed at convolution.) Is that worth putting in the article? Is there a good reference for it? -- Spireguy (talk) 16:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean?

The article states "Given a completely multiplicative function f then f (g*h) = (f g)*(f h). "

Is (f g) pointwise multipllication?

Virginia-American (talk) 19:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. It's defined in the article on completely multiplicative functions.

Virginia-American (talk) 15:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dirichlet convolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150222094526/http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~sfinch/csolve/try.pdf to http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~sfinch/csolve/try.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dirichlet hyperbola method

Would be nice to have section or article on this http://planetmath.org/dirichlethyperbolamethod Wqwt (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]