Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exberliner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 05:53, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
Tagged for speedy deletion as vanity/advert, but does'nt look like a CSD to me. I think it should be kept as notable to English-speakers in Berlin. Kappa 09:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, cleanup and expand. Borderline notability, [1]. Megan1967 10:55, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Appears genuine publication: on that basis, keep --Simon Cursitor 12:44, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It is genuine, I've read it. Keep. Jamyskis 14:36, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Clean up to expand its notability. Circulation figures would help, and a little less on "you can find a party." Geogre 15:07, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I will do when this VfD is over. Jamyskis 15:13, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't have to wait, although I suppose the article might still fail this vfd and your work would be wasted. Kappa 22:11, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I will do when this VfD is over. Jamyskis 15:13, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Expand and improve the article ASAP. Harro5 00:18, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, I guess. I'm an English speaker in Berlin and I've read it (once) too. It's not a good newspaper, but it's a newspaper. --Angr/comhrá 04:55, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.