Talk:1823

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1823 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.

If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:38, 7 May 2004 (UTC)(talk) the only thing i wanted to mention is that in the year 1823, 31st of august (nowhere mentioned) was the date when the french army invaded the south of spain and "occupied???" the forteresse of trocadero. trocadero is still a very famous place in paris near the champ de mars. is it politically correct to name a place after a "victory" of the french army in the neighbouring country of spain ????????????. i think : NO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.162.40.79 (talk) 12:05, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]