Talk:Sanatorium

Hospitals High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dictionary

This needs to be improved beyond "dic-def" status, and the current article moved to Wiktionary, IMHO. Rlquall 13:58, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Redirect

Searching "convalescent home" shouldn't redirect to this page, it should go to the "nursing home" page. ZebThorn (talk) 16:38, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sanatorium/Sanitarium

I have a couple of issues with the quote which appears (in the manner stated) to be attributed to "Dr. R G Ferguson"... the first of which is that the resource the quote links to attributes it to the writings of Dr. J A Holbrook, not Ferguson.
More pertinently to the information itself, while this anecdote is interesting, it is not necessarily the generally accepted reasoning for these two spellings; however its prominence in the upper portion of the "History" section implies it is. If I remember correctly the Oxford English Dictionary asserts that "sanatorium" is the older word, and "sanitarium" was originally a misspelling, and now alternate spelling. The claim that they're derived from two different words is undermined in a couple respects:
1) The normative adjective "sanus" (healthy) is the root of that word family, not the verb "sano" (to heal) as Holbrook asserts... problematic also is that "sano" has two other meanings, as a dative adjective ("healthier") and an ablative adjective ("LESS healthy").
2) The dichotomy between "sanatorium" and "sanitarium" contains no explanation for the third spelling "sanitorium"; this would suggest to me that BOTH alternates are more or less corrupted versions that have fallen into use.
3) The group that erected the first Canadian sanatorium in Muskoka is supposedly the group responsible for changing "sanitarium" to "sanatorium" -- however this group is in modernity called the "National Sanitarium Association" (as it stands today -- http://nationalsanitarium.ca/)
4) Holbrook's quote is the only instance I can find that suggests the spelling variant was in any way intentional; further it is the only instance I can find that suggests "sanitarium" is the older, correct word. Admittedly I only looked for about half an hour, but even the National Sanitarium Association (link above in #3) has no mention of this anecdote on their History page.
I'd possibly remove it myself, except I'm about 4 months lapsed on my OED subscription, and I may simply fail at internet searches. It's possible. I'm hoping someone with more guts than I will weigh the arguments and decide if I'm full of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.162.31 (talk) 23:43, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring the Mental Variant

Can we get a bit of info added as to the mental hospital variant of sanatoriums, such as the one depicted in the Art Spiegelman novel 'Maus'? It's mentioned in the opening paragraph and then the focus turns solely to tuberculosis.

76.84.169.253 (talk) 03:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sanatorium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041215034537/http://www.lung.ca/tb/tbhistory/sanatoriums/type.html to http://www.lung.ca/tb/tbhistory/sanatoriums/type.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.louisvillecardinal.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/10/21/3f94b487286b5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]