Talk:List of archaeological sites by country

This article was nominated for deletion on February 3, 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Below the listing for Mexico, it previously said: "All the above are either Aztec or Olmec sites." Actually, none of them are, as can be seen by visiting the articles. -- Infrogmation 22:29 8 Jul 2003 (UTC)

What about ordering the sites according to periods? --Yak 15:29, Mar 16, 2004 (UTC)

Instead I think this should be separated into categories for each country like Category:Archaeological sites in the United States which then is a category of Category:Archaeological sites by country Pschemp | Talk 19:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japan is out of order.

Can someone fix Japan? It is beneath Belize and is listed as having an archaeological site which is actually found in Belize. Then, if you look at Japan in its proper place in the list, it still has that false site listed.

Fixed Pschemp | Talk 01:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Moved banner to the top of the page. Deucalionite (talk) 14:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aramus

Under Armenia their is a site called Aramus. If you click on this link you get on an article relating to an animal called limpkin. I don't think it is meant the animal with this link. Jacobine19:15, April 1, 2006

Palestine

Since when has palestine been a part of Israel, its like saying Iraq is a state of the U.S.A, or the solomons part of Australia. There needs to be a section down the bottom for quasi states of conflick areas etc. Enlil Ninlil 16:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Massive Clean-Up and Reorganization

I notice that this article/list was up for deletion back in 2006 based on numerous issues. There was no consensus. Since then it appears that no one has taken ownership of it. So I plan to "be bold" and do a massive clean-up and reorganization. I will then maintain and watch over it. If you don't like the results, then nominate it for deletion again. It can't get much worse than it already is. Biglovinb (talk) 09:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

INDIA=

incomplete. Please add Elephanta Caves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephanta_Caves

thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.223.180.192 (talk) 03:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Moon

This is not a joke: The first manned and unmanned landing sites on the moon need to be listed. They are the location of what are among the most monumental events in history. So far, they are pristine. Kdammers (talk) 07:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The moon is not a country. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 02:14, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that, but sites outside of countries (e.g., in Antarctica and many ocean sites) should be listed - either in a partner site or by changing the name of this site. Kdammers (talk) 09:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing archaeological about landing sites on the moon. ♆ CUSH ♆ 04:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, there is.Wikipedia's description of archaeological site: "An archaeological site is a place (or group of physical sites) in which evidence of past activity is preserved (either prehistoric or historic or contemporary), and which has been, or may be, investigated using the discipline of archaeology and represents a part of the archaeological record. Sites may range from those with few or no remains visible above ground, to buildings and other structures still in use."Gibson, Ralph (2001) “Lunar Archaeology: the Application of Federal Historic Preservation Law to the Site Where Humans First Set Foot Upon the Moon.” Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces. Kdammers (talk) 07:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So who has conducted the discipline of archaeology on the moon sites ? ♆ CUSH ♆ 13:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UK

Cambridgeshire: Mold Bronze Age house: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-35280290 Kdammers (talk) 00:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

numbered

Which country has the most archaeological sites? 19:35, 4 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:6:1178:B281:A900:6AFC:8271:1BA3 (talk)

Any Numbers? 2003:6:1178:B281:58AD:F474:BC12:4149 (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of archaeological sites by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080207000543/http://wmf.org/watch.html to http://wmf.org/watch.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archaeological sites in England

I noticed that 'Mother Grundy's Parlour' was not linked to an article so though I would link it to Creswell Crags but then noticed that 'Creswell Crags' is not a member of 'List of archaeological sites by country#United Kingdom'. The 'Creswell Crags' is a member of 'Category:Archaeological sites in Derbyshire' and 'Category:Archaeological sites in England', which pre-existed and is well populated. I have created a sub-category 'Archaeological sites in England'. I am not sure if I have done the right thing though. Wales does not have a sub-category 'Archaeological sites in Wales'. 'Archaeological sites in Scotland' redirects to 'National Monuments Record of Scotland', which is a bit confusing. If you think the inclusion of 'Archaeological sites in England' within 'List of archaeological sites by country' then please revert, but be aware that many English sites won't be accessible via this list. I intend to put the 'Archaeology of Scotland' (Category:Archaeology of Scotland) as a sub category within this list. Again revert if I have messed up. 2A00:23C4:D896:6000:A5E3:DA3B:AE05:702D (talk) 21:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]