User talk:AlenWatters

Just a note to let you know that a category you created, Category:Unionists (Scotland) is up for deletion. See the discussion here - Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion. Catchpole 17:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alen, I also nominated Category:Scottish nationalists for deletion. Please see the same page. Ta. --Mais oui! 17:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category and such

Greetings! First, I wanted to tell you that I found your attempt to establish a Scottish nationalists and unionists category interesting and it made me learn the allegiance of some I did not know about, as far as the project had the time to go. I'm still not sure whether I agree on the verdict, but I enjoin you to "listify" the project. Maybe a distinction could be made so the list includes only non-politicians, to address the "you'll have to list all SNP MSPs" issue.

Second, I know that you were the one who answered my request for more info on Jack McConnell's policies. I'm still wondering: what are the major acheivements (and disapointments) of his administration? Any notable legislation?

Finally, I have some questions about the Scottish independence and nationalist movement. Would you be willing to try to answer some? As someone from Quebec, I, as many here, look at the developments in Scotland with great sympathy and admiration. And I will never forget when I heard the message of a Scottish politician sent to the Parti Québécois National Congress of 2000 that called the SNP and the PQ "nos partis frères" (our brother parties), said (if I remember well) that Scots would come to Quebec for inspiration after Quebec sovereignty and calling Quebec and Scotland "nos deux nations" (our two nations). A message from one Alex Salmond. --Liberlogos 05:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Stausna.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stausna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scotland and Quebec

Hi Alen! I'm the Quebecer who wrote you earlier about the possibility of asking you questions about the Scottish independence movement. I never got around to it since I had a mountain of things to do and troubles to deal with. Thanks for all the good words and you willingness to shed more light on the subject. If you have any time now, I would like to send you my questions via email (which I would prefer). I see you have not made it possible to join you by email through Wikipedia so you could simply use the "Email this user" function at the left on my profile. I see the SNP is still in the lead. Impressive; congrats. But, what will be the open options for the cause without a majority of pro-independence MSP's at Holyrood?

So, it is refreshing (and encouraging) to witness this in our sister nation since here, the independence movement took a bit of a beating in our last elections, in March. Many reasons can be brought up, some that contradict others! So, this last election made me, once again, see similarities between our two situations. As people spoke of the possibility of a first minority government in 129 years (we still got the old British First-past-the-post thing, despite much demand for reform), commentators discussed much of the problem of a PQ minority government having to somehow find support within the ADQ (nationalist without being for independence) members of the National Assembly. And we now have a "left of the left" party (Québec solidaire) that is a player on the scene while also being for independence, at the left of the PQ social democrats (like Solidarity, SSP and Greens with the SNP). I do find it reassuring that our nationalist movments tend to gravitate more to the progressive side, which has surprised some Europeans I spoke to like an Italian and a Frenchwoman, used to a rightist, more closed nationalism.

Here, people in the independence movement that are relatively well-informed are aware of what's happenning in Scotland and follow it with interest. And there is some mainstream media attention, mostly in the written press, but I feel it still isn't covered as much as it would deserve, as it might also be be on your end about our affairs (we did get the thing about Blair's using scare tactics by saying Montreal had lost economic power because of the "separatist threat", though - it's much more complex than that). There are exceptions. For example, I uploaded this on YouTube, which was originally shown on federal public television. I don't like the conspiracy theories around this, but still, our mainstream media is much controlled by people opposed to independence. Also, it is a general problem, which is that we simply do not have enough of an "inter"-nationalist view of humanity, politics and information. That is one of the reasons why I plan on creating a website dedicated to international politics and cultures, especially centered on independence and progressive nationalist movements of non-sovereign peoples. And, with current events, it would center even more on Scottish affairs. Your answers will therefor be highly helpful. If you have any other ideas about other people or ressources that could help me have clear sum-ups of Scottish affairs, you can give them to me. And I would be quite happy and honored to answer any questions you may want to ask about Quebec affairs. --Liberlogos 18:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Logoump.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logoump.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nicola sturgeon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicola sturgeon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thunderwing 15:48, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Winneewing.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Winneewing.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Stewart McDonald acceptance speech.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Stewart McDonald acceptance speech.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]