User talk:Claude girardin

Hello Claude girardin and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

This user is a participant in WikiProject Switzerland.

List of waterfalls of Switzerland

Good start to an article but you need to expand it and preferably section it (similar to this article). Another note it may be worth editing List of waterfalls#Switzerland to include this article. xytramtkcsgy 15:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A time-keeping

I couldn't figure out this article. Is it about an object called a "time-keeping"? We put the subject of the article in the first line in bold type. (which is done like this ''' example ''') Rmhermen 15:30, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)

So sorry, actually it is about horology / watch / clock

mechanism.

Unfortunately I did it wrong on the "mechanism" disambiguation page.

Appreciating your assistance. One day I hope I shall be proficient.

Best regards

Claude Girardin

The Waltham.ch Website

Please refrain from adding links to the waltham.ch set. As per Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided item 3), you are not supposed to add websites that you are in charge of. There is way too much temptation for people to add links to their own web in places that are not really appropriate and in biased ways, and thus creating link spam. I have replaced many of the links to the waltham.ch website with more appropriate links, such as to articles in the wikipedia or to original sources. Thanks. Wrs1864 03:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have now not been related with Waltham at all since over 2 years. Appreciating your caution. As my main subject of interest, I shall try step by step to include more informative articles about the Swiss Watch Industry, without further ado. Best regards claude 14:37, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry FH article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I irrevocably release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Schutz 13:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your reply is on my talk page. Schutz 20:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The world to bee

Please do not post your original poems, such as The world to bee. See WP:NOR. NawlinWiki 18:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

swisswatchguy.blogspot.com

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Wrs1864 (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vacuum Chronometer Corp.

A tag has been placed on Vacuum Chronometer Corp., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ThaddeusB (talk) 17:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Foundation Quality Fleurier

A tag has been placed on Foundation Quality Fleurier, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Foundation Quality Fleurier and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Drmies (talk) 21:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of La Venoge, poem

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article La Venoge, poem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I think the poem is still under copyright, and the article is currently just the poem.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Austin512 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your questions

Hi, I have moved your questions to Category talk:Culinary Heritage of Switzerland and replied there. Discussion belongs on a talk page, not on a category page itself :-) Sandstein 05:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of General Watch Co

A tag has been placed on General Watch Co requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jeni ^(talk)_(Jenuk1985) 01:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ikepod. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pyho ^T / _C 17:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Métaux Précieux SA Métalor

A tag has been placed on Métaux Précieux SA Métalor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Start Existing (talk) 22:26, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Métaux Précieux SA Métalor Hangon

Firstly I would like to stress out that I am neither personally nor family-wise, nor in any other way connected with the company, neither financially nor in any other possible way.

I have been lately doing my best, mainly on E and F wiki, to give a much clearer and thourough knowledge of the watch industry, in particular the Swiss Watch Industry. Having spent all my managerial career within the industry, I feel that it is necessary that the relaating articles give more knowledge to the people interested in, as has been the case up to now.

I had planned to continue constructing the article with much more technical knowledge of what involves the making of precious metal watch cases, etc.,

I do not feel that this page can be constructed as an advertisement for a company that does business only with manufacturers, who have the knowledge and can decide to place their orders wherever they please (mind you there are not so many refining companies in the field world wide.

At your disposal for further talks.

In any case, my trying to contribute to wikipedia might be somewhat more worthy than a quick deletion. Appreciating your kind cooperation. claude (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Century Time Gems Ltd

The article Century Time Gems Ltd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Written like an advertisement, in a similar style to (now-deleted) Vacuum Chronometer Cord.. Does not show much notability, and does not have reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (X! · talk) · @032 · 23:46, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Century Time Gems

An article that you have been involved in editing, Century Time Gems, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Century Time Gems. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 22:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Endura Watch Factory

A tag has been placed on Endura Watch Factory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 15:36, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IKEPOD NEW YORK

A tag has been placed on IKEPOD NEW YORK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 15:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benrus

The article Benrus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, questionable notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 10:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

I can see you've had a bit of a baptism of fire, but I hope you stick with Wikipedia. I have removed the deletion notice from Benrus; it is immediately apparent from my searches of news stories etc. that this was a significant watch manufacturer. Thank you for helping to improve Wikipedia by starting this article. The next step is to improve the article by adding references to reliable sources to verify the information in the article, and to find some useful external links for readers seeking to learn more about the company and its watches. If you'd like any help with editing, please drop me a note on my talk page. Fences&Windows 22:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Villard Gilles

Thank you for correcting that! Until you left a comment to me, I was not aware of the distinction of Swiss people as French Swiss, German Swiss and English Swiss. My husband (who lived in Germany many years before I met him) found my ignorance of that amusing. --Oddharmonic (talk) 22:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham-Louis Perrelet

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Abraham-Louis Perrelet, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://watches.3345.com.au/cyclopedia/watches_fine-automatic-history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abraham-Louis Perrelet

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Claude. I've deleted the article because it used text taken from this website, which doesn't state that it is released under a license compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike. As text is automatically copyrighted, we can't use it without permission from the person who wrote it. The subject sounds very notable though and you are welcome to create a new article using your own text, not that taken from elsewhere. Regards, – Toon 23:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, actually I just copied the text from the wiki article automatic watches, an article which has not been queried at all. Any diffrence of application of the wiki rules? Never mind, I'll come up with an article of my own if you help me to wikify it then. claude (talk) 05:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, in that case it's possible that the external site copied from us without attribution. I'll have a look, having been previously unaware of the other article. If it was originally on Wikipedia, I'll restore the article, but you should note that even on in-wiki copied our license requires that you link to the original article to preserve the attribution of the original author - see WP:SPLITTING. – Toon 13:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that looks like what happened, I've restored the article. I should have noticed your note in the edit summary, apologies for that. – Toon 13:53, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Erare humanum est! Never mind. I am actually translating the wiki fr page into English in my own words. I would then appreciate that you possibly helped me in establishing the sources & references and wikified the whole page.

claude (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to help out where I can — but I'll have to leave the translation to you! – Toon 13:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on it and shall revert to you ASAP. :-)

claude (talk) 22:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Brel

Thank you for your comment re my "who" tag on the Brel article.

You seem to have been editing here for at least as long as I have. You must therefore be aware that claims such as "most of the French speaking people over 30-40 years of age" carry no weight unless properly referenced. I invite you to improve the article by providing the appropriate refs.

Your assertions that I am unfamiliar with this artists' work and would benefit from reading lyrics in translation should have been made with greater caution. It may be 15 years since I left France for other climes, but I think I've managed to keep a *fair* grasp on my own culture and language. :)

Chris(tophe) Et bien voilà! Ne soyez donc pas plus royaliste que le roi!

Cordialeent

claude (talk) 11:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of castles and fortresses in Switzerland

Claude, yes I was aware that Grisons is also Graubunden and that that's what the Canton article is called. I agree that it should be called Graubunden for all the reasons that you mentioned. I just hadn't gotten around to changing it in the List of castles since I was mostly just adding them as placeholders while I was adding information on Swiss heritage sites to the municipalities articles. I'll put a note on the article talk page and change it in a few days if no one complains. Tobyc75 (talk) 22:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Appreciating. I am also planning to establish some of the missing articles on the Swiss Castles in French and English. As I am not a wiki pro, perhaps you could ten help me wikifying them (especially ref + images). :-) claude (talk) 09:36, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Williamine

The article Williamine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This proprietary brand is not sufficiently notable to merit an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Lambiam 21:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Like "Frigidaire", the brand Williamine has become a generic name for the pear "eau de vie" from the Williams pear. It has been for ages one of the few specific "Schnaps" of Switzerland, typical for the Canton of Valais, like "Absinthe" is from the Val de Travers (Canton de Neuchâtel) or the "Damacine" from Canton du Jura. Now by what criterias wouldl you judge whether it is sufficiently or unsuficiently notable? I can assure you that Williamine's notoriety is worldwide, at least in the best restaurants and watering holes. I would strongly oppose deletion, also from the viewpoint that it is a part of Switzerland's identity.[reply]

Best regards

claude (talk) 19:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Motorways of Switzerland

Hello Claude!

Good to see your edits to this article, you're keeping it well up to date. That said, there are a few problems with it, and I've tried to clarify what I think they are on the article's talk page. I noticed particularly that you re-worded the sentence about frequent exits - It wasn't that I couldn't understand what was written, but it isn't possible to prove it. Suggest you have a look at what I've written at Talk:Motorways of Switzerland. Thanks. --Peeky44 _{What's on your mind?} 21:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Waltham Model 1857

The article Waltham Model 1857 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability, no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Devourer09 23:31, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Benrus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Benrus, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.thewatchguy.com/pages/benrus.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Benrus and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Benrus, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Benrus with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Benrus. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Benrus saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! L Faraone 17:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Era Watch Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Era Watch Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Watch Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 22:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Era Watch Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Era Watch Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Watch Company (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. →TheSpecialUser^Talk_{Contributions}* 08:42, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Claude girardin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Claude girardin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alt.horology

The article Alt.horology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no evidence that this newsgroup is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 08:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Waltham Aircraft Clock Corporation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waltham Aircraft Clock Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waltham Aircraft Clock Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 06:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]