Talk:In pectore

Catholicism Mid‑importance

In pectore is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Comment

Wasn't Pope Leo X also originally named cardinal in pectore? 4 Mar 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.132.146.220 (talk) 08:47, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He was not. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Can someone explain why a Pope would do this? I don't understand what good a Cardinal can do if nobody knows he's a Cardinal. Thanks! FreplySpang (talk) 14:44, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This would be done if the place this cardinal was going to work in was a dangerous environment for a Catholic. Such as China, where Catholics (and Christians in general) are not formally tolerated, and the presence of a Cardinal would at least lead to him getting imprisoned (and probably shot). It does say this in the article.

Some of the catholics in the area would know that a secret cardinal had been appointed, although obviously secrecy would be vital, and they would very probably not know his identity.

The cardinal would also then be able to communicate back to the Vatican on the situation for Catholics in that country, and allow the church to work with an increased knowledge on improving tolerance of Catholicism - and Christianity in general - in that country.

Proto 10:21, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Why was the Archbishop of Riga created in pectore in 1998? Has the Latvian government been persecuting Catholics? john k 16:08, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

As it is not quite clear:

Would *some* in pectore Cardinals know that they have been appointed?

Have there been any cases of problems arising because it is known to the authorities that there is an in pectore cardinal but not who he is?

For those who are into such things, and with a suitable background knowledge, this could provide a useful starting point for some speculative fiction.

Jackiespeel 14:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One other unpublished 20th-century cardinal

Currently, the article says that the only 20th-century case of expired "in pectore" appointment was that of the 3 cardinals named as such in 1960. The FIU cardinals site says that there were 2 cardinals named "in pectore" in 1916 and only one (Adolf Bertram) was eventually published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 19:50, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll proceed with the expired in-pectore appointment (had been made 1916 by Benedict XV). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Added now. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strange

Indeed the article does not make clear if an in pectore cardinal himself is notified, however secretly, that he has been made a cardinal. It is obvious that such appointments are made "in the eyes of God", therefore secular notification is unnecessary per se; still I would imagine that even He would not choose to ignore common courtesies. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.1.225.95 (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pope Martin V

I don't know much about the history of this stuff, but on the article Papal conclave, 1431 it says that Pope Martin V initiated the custom of creating cardinals without published their name right away, and links here. But in this article it says Pope Paul III was the first to initiate this custom. Someone who knows more about this stuff should probably fix this. Wgunther (talk) 02:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Miranda doesn't think Martin V made in pectore appointments because he shared the information (he says they were "known to the other cardinals", but there's a good source that calls Martin's appointments in pectore. Martin certainly didn't publish them initially and did publish them later, which seems just what we'd expect for in pectore appointments. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A question

The article doesn't make it clear how the process of creating "in pectore" cardinals occurs. Does the Pope, at a consistory, declare "I wish to create x amount of cardinals" (or some other phrase) without disclosing the name(s) of the cardinal(s) created, revealing them at a later date? 101090ABC (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what happens. See this New York Times report. "Pope John Paul II named 14 new cardinals today, including his new Vatican Secretary of State. The Pope said he had chosen a 15th cardinal “in pectore” — in his heart — and there was speculation that the unidentified cardinal was from a Communist country." Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Term used at 2015's Wikimania

See Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-07-22/Wikimanía report (as of 21:42, 24 July 2015):

[Jimbo] Wales' announcement [at Wikimanía 2015] of Wikipedian of the year was made in pectore, meaning that he did not reveal the name at this time because doing so has the potential to bring reprisal or harm to the recipient.

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

www.catholic-hierarchy.org appears to state Pope Leo X Giovanni de’ Medici was Elevated to Cardinal "In Pectore" 9 Mar 1489

www.catholic-hierarchy.org appears to state Pope Leo X Giovanni de’ Medici was Elevated to Cardinal "In Pectore" 9 Mar 1489 If true, this page should be upated. http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bdeme.html Pope Leo X Giovanni de’ Medici

9 Mar 1489 13.2 Elevated to Cardinal In Pectore 23 Mar 1489 13.2 Appointed Cardinal-Deacon of Santa Maria in Domnica 26 Mar 1492 16.2 Elevated to Cardinal 9 Mar 1513 37.2 Elected Pope (Roma {Rome}, Italy)

http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/event/cs1492.html Pope Pius III (Francesco Todeschini-Piccolomini) Consistory - 26 March 1492 Published (Previously a Cardinal In Pectore): Giovanni de’ Medici http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/event/cs1492.html

http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/event/cs1489.html Consistory - 9 March 1489 Pope: Innocent VIII (Giovanni Battista Cibo) Created Cardinal: Lorenzo Cibo de’ Mari †, Archbishop of Benevento, Italy Ardicino della Porta (Jr.) †, Bishop of Aleria, France Antonio Gentile Pallavicini †, Bishop of Orense, Spain André d’Espinay †, Archbishop of Bordeaux, France Pierre d’Aubusson, O.S.Io.Hieros. †, Grand Master of Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St John of Jerusalem Maffeo Gherardi, O.S.B. †, Patriarch of Venezia {Venice}, Italy Giovanni de’ Medici † Federico Sanseverino †, Administrator of Maillezais, France

YourHumbleServant (talk) 03:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]