User talk:MiracleMat

Personal notes

Things I would like to work on:

Air Force Board game
User Graphic Designer
Military Medals and Ribbons
Pinball Machines
Printing
Web Press
Ecoscape
Model railrodaing / details / special effects / operation

Wikiproject Color

Hi MiracleMat, I saw your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Color. It seems to have been dormant for a while, even though there was a lot of great work and discussion already done. I'm looking to start it back up again. Care to join me? --Laura S 00:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, what would you like to work on? MiracleMat 17:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's great news! Right now it seems we've picked up right where the others left off; ie, arguing over the technical details of color representation. I'm hoping to get a little other work done on the side (such as bringing the color article to FA) so that we don't get hung up on the details. I've started a to-do list of sorts at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Color/Strategy, so feel free to take a look and make any changes you feel necessary. I'm trying to focus on the whole realm of color-related articles, not just lists of colors. It might be a little on the ambitious side but you won't go very far being overly cautious :) -- Laura S | talk to me 20:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and one other thing, there's a lot of (I think good) discussion on the project's talk page, it would be great if you weigh in - we need all the viewpoints we can get on some of this stuff. -- Laura S | talk to me 02:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page, to keep the conversation in one place. -- Laura S | talk to me 15:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re your question

Thanks for the note. As you know, we can only use reliable sources for verification, which generally implies sources that exist in some permanent form (ie a book, newspaper, DVD etc). How did you come by the information from Ralph Guldahl, Jr? If there's a published record of, say, an interview or something, I'd guess that would be ok. You could also try asking at the Reliable sources noticeboard to get a more informed view than mine ;) I hope this helps, EyeSerene^talk 17:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you had a GA copyedit review on the Edelbrock article. Let me know if you want me to copyedit it. I've done numerous GA reviews. Royal broil 00:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice that I've created a section at Talk:Edelbrock where I'm in the middle of doing a GA level review of the article. Note that this is not the official GA review process. That needs to be done with by someone impartial who hasn't edited the article. The review needs to happen through the WP:GA process. You do need to do a fair bit of work to get it up to GA standards. One of the biggest problems that I've found so far is that you have numerous statistical & controversial statements that are not sourced to reliable sources. Please also read the article to see what things are in the article that someone could argue against you, because these are either original research or POV. There are a few, not a huge number. Things like "Its simple compact design launched a generation of innovations that stood the test of time". It sounds like marketing from Chevy. A Ford fan who hates Chevy would argue against you. Overall the article is well-done. Note that I'm a pretty harsh critic at the GA level so if I'm okay with something then you'll probably get through GA pretty easily. You should expect to wait around 1 month after nominating it at GA before it actually gets reviewed. Please wait until my review and your editing is done before nominating it. Royal broil 13:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

See Help:Cite. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 15:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Magic Realm game.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Magic Realm game.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bill Zaring.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bill Zaring.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. matt br 06:42, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alexanderthegreatcover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alexanderthegreatcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]