User talk:Lcolson

Welcome!

Hello, Lcolson, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language

Happy editing!

Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:45, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Gas core reactor rocket

This looks a bit cut-and-paste, and as it stands it will be suspected of violating copyright. You must rework this material in your own words or you will get called on the carpet for it. DV8 2XL 16:09, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is cut and paste... from a paper I wrote for a space nuclear class, hence the references. As is, I thought that it would be better than the current article which didn't properly explain the difference between terrestrial versions and versions for a space mission. So...it is in my own words, but it might not sound as novice as some of my other articles because I actually had to right it for a letter grade. The cut and paste thing needs to be fixed, but I can't seem to find a good place to start, so take a wack at it if you want.

Cool. It IS well written, which is why it stuck out, ;) but if it's your work its OK. Mostly the ...(1, pg. 530) things have to go, or be converteed into wikifed references. Also the section Technology summary and outlook needs to be framed in NPOV terms. That would be about it and it would be a great entry DV8 2XL 18:42, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear weapon/A-bomb RfC

There is an RfC over at Talk:Nuclear weapon: Should a separate A-bomb article exist, or is it better merged with Nuclear weapon and/or Nuclear weapon design? Your input in this mater would be appreciated. DV8 2XL 03:31, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Depleted uranium dispute resolution

As agreed, I had the DU article unlocked and replaced it with the /basic verson with links to the Health effects and Gulf War syndrome pages, bringing this round to an end. I think the fact that we managed to hammer this out by ourselves is a feather in our caps and an example to all who are in conflicts on the 'pedia. I thank you all. --DV8 2XL 01:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enriched limit

Would you care to weight in on this one, I don't think there is much of a question? --DV8 2XL 04:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clean And Environmentally Safe Advanced Reactor

I just put this up. Could you do me the favor of looking it over for any glaring errors or omissions? Thanks. --DV8 2XL 00:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Headings

Thanks for your many positive contributions to nuclear-ralated articles! There is lots to do as I'm sure you have observed.

But please don't use the first level of heading in articles. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Headings and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings) for the conventions.

Another thing you need to watch is NPOV. For example, While this fear is not entirely warranted, the resistance is still there (from Molten salt reactor#Political issues) needs some rephrasing at least, and I'd leave it out altogether. Andrewa 19:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know I don't fully understand the heading conventions. The NPOV point that you mention in molten salt wasn't put there by me, I think it was put there by a MSR proponet or ex ORNL worker (I do try to phrase things in a unbiased way). When I origianlly worked on that article some proponets corrected me on several points, so I suggested that they add some stuff since they sounded more knowledgeable on the subject than me, the NPOV point was one of those additions I think. Lcolson 21:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The heading convention is partly historical. MediaWiki translates the "=xxx=" to an H1 style in HTML, "==xxx==" to H2, and so on. However, Wikipedia style convention is to use H1 for the MediaWiki-generated article title line only, and to use H2 as the highest level of headings within the article. So, in the main (or article) namespace, the "=xxx=" syntax isn't used at all.

Point taken about the POV stuff. Great to have people with ORNL experience on team, too. Andrewa 23:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Time for RfArb

Since James cannot have his way on Health and environmental effects of depleted uranium he has decide to scrap the outcome of the mediation. [1] [2] , [3], [4], [5]. I see little other option at this point. Ten Dead Chickens 19:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time for this at this moment, I got a research project whose outcome my future depends on coming due. I looked at your and DV8's and TDC's referenced issues (RfArb), James has been manipulating the talk/history pages again to make him look better, beware of this. I came across one refenced criticism from me about his references on a talk page history, and it had been changed to put better references in (not the articlce, but the talk page history). There was no reason for this except to make it look like (to an outside observer) that he had good sources for info. He often does revisionist things like this (as I'm sure you know). Lcolson 12:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BN-350

Your article BN-350 has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 13:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Come and join the fun!

Go to Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Depleted uranium and related articles The mediator is from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals group so we will get a fair hearing on the science. Nrcprm2026 / JamesS has put up scans of the papers he claims prove his theories on UO₃ gas with links on the page I'm pointing at. As you were part of the original mediation request you're welcome to participate. If you don't feel like it, that's cool but read the papers anyway for what they are worth. --DV8 2XL 03:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nuclear_Technology

Looking good but I think you need to add nuclear materials to the mix. I know there is already a category for this. See here: Cat:nuclear materials. Otherwise I think this template is long overdue. Props to you for starting it. --DV8 2XL 23:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Htc.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Htc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Sherool (talk) 22:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and delete it. I uploaded this set of formulas when I was still new to wikipedia and didn't know the math notation. It is not used now. Lcolson 22:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok, I just listed Image:Htc2.jpg too. --Sherool (talk) 23:08, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Heat Transfer Coefficient.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Heat Transfer Coefficient.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -SCEhard T 00:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Packistani A-bomb

I have put this article up at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Packistani A-bomb. Your opinion on this matter would be appreciated. --DV8 2XL 01:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear power controversy

Why does this article exist? See Talk:Nuclear_power_controversy#Why_does_this_article_exist.3F — Omegatron 20:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image Image:GenIVRoadmap.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:GenIVRoadmap.jpg, by Strangerer, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:GenIVRoadmap.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:GenIVRoadmap.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:GenIVRoadmap.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image Image:Gfr.gif

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Gfr.gif, by Strangerer, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Gfr.gif is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Gfr.gif, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Gfr.gif itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voltammetry

Your version sounds good to me. If I ever get a chance I'll wad through Nicholson & Shain (1964) paper and figure out how to describe a stationary electrode and then find a good source to describe hydrodynamic voltammetry theory.--OMCV (talk) 13:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on finishing the PhD.--OMCV (talk) 05:02, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm still winding down a little bit, but if I find the time, I may incorporate some pictures/diagrams from my dissertation into some wikipedia articles. Lcolson (talk) 16:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice work on creating a wide array of nuclear energy-related articles! Spurrious Correlation 07:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Heat Transfer Coefficient.jpg

The file File:Heat Transfer Coefficient.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use. Replaced with text at Heat transfer coefficient

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]