This article was nominated for deletion on 16 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about what you think is cute. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about what you think is cute at the Reference desk.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the section about Caretaking please replace:
"Melanie Glocker argued in 2009 that the cuteness that an infant embodies can motivate the type of care one takes while caring for the infant".
with:
"Melanie Glocker argued in 2009 that cuteness of an infant motivates caretaking in unrelated adults"
It seems strange that this article ignore the self-evident fact that 'cute' adults often elicit a caregiver response, and that makeup and dress may be used by adults to emphasise such traits.
