This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The contents of the Bridget Sullivan page were merged into Lizzie Borden on September 12, 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
in the chapter about television, i added the episode of The Practice but my English is not that perfect so if anyone can rewrite it in a better way that will be good enough for the English wikipedia, that would be great, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.179.117.32 (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm curious why the listing for Andrew Borden says both the 2021 and 2022 inflation adjustments. We really only need the most recent. I'm thinking of doing away with the 2021 unless there's a reason for it to be there? The Introvert Next To You (talk) 20:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I would remove the 2022 figure, which was added manually and is not a result of the inflation template. Since inflation equivalents are provided multiple times in the article, all for 2021, they should all be the same. Schazjmd(talk)20:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think about splitting some of this content to a separate article about the Borden murders? The murders themselves have been written about by dozens of researchers and authors over the years and it is quite strange that we do not have a standalone article about them.--16:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC) User:Namiba16:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lizzie Borden doesn't have any notability outside the murders, so a rename might be possible, but a split would probably not be useful. AnonMoos (talk) 17:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are quite a number of sources which discuss her life, even if the the murders take up a central place. The article cites many of them.--User:Namiba19:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very bad idea. The two topics are inextricably linked, and best presented together, because someone arriving to learn about one would almost certainly want to learn something about the other. Splitting would require duplication of material, and ongoing coordination of the two articles, to no apparent benefit. The only way this would make sense would be if the combined article becomes so large as to be unwieldy. We can start discussing that when the article's about 3X its current size. EEng06:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
