Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Throwed
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Transwikied. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:38, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was move to wiktionary. - Ta bu shi da yu 05:28, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Dicdef. Inter 21:05, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Move to Wiktionary Because it is simply a definition.Zantastik 21:28, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Transwiktionary; dictdef. —Korath (Talk) 21:53, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Transwiki and delete. — Ливай | ☺ 23:26, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable neologism, dictionary definition. Megan1967 01:54, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Reply to Megan1967 : If the term "throwed" is not a notable "neologism", than how is the second definition of the term "skeet" still in the wikipedia?
- Why don't you put it up for VfD then o anonymous one. Megan1967 07:40, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and/or move to wiktionaryis a dictionary definition it just belongs on wiktionary thats all. bakuzjw (aka 578) 23:21, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.