User talk:Tzarius
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
Zzyzx11 | Talk 00:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Dubbo
[edit]Sorry about the dodgy edit. No link was showing up when I viewed the page so I deleted the line because I suspected something dodgy. I still don't see a link when I view the page with IE BTW Andrew Kay
- That's ok. The link appears at the very top of the page, it says "In other languages: Polski". Tzarius 21:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
GMail
[edit]Hello,
I just saw your mailing list work around solution added to gmail and I like it. It is a great simple idea. :)
The only problem with it, and that where I'm asking about your experience with it, is that if someone changes e-mail, or if I want to change someone's e-mail, I'd have to manually go and update the list, right?
I know that sounds noobish, but I rather, sometimes, ask someone instead of trying it myself. I spend about the same time, but with the plus I get to know more about a person and myself. :)
By the way, funny user page that one of yours!
Thanks for your time.--Cawas 17:03, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Re:Gmail Hehe, that's still pretty cool. Yeah, I'm hoping for them to read, at very least, the limitations we are listing in for Gmail. Maybe they're not caring too much about contacts because maybe they'll integrate everything with Orkut. Hopefull they will. And maybe add a better search feature and backup for orkut. Just making Orkut "backup" through CSV the same way it's done in Gmail would be great already.
--Cawas 01:57, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
DVD format info
[edit]Thanks for the link full of DVD format info you found for me. That was (more or less) exactly what I was looking for. Steve Summit (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Healing Factor
[edit]These are the actual marvel universe entries for Wolverine from the Marvel Universe that specifically state that the character has a Superhuman regenerative healing factor, not a metahuman regenerative healing factor. This is official Marvel canon. If you aren't the guy that keeps changing superhuman to metahuman on that page then disregard this.
- http://img472.imageshack.us/my.php?image=wol22dm.jpg
- http://img265.imageshack.us/my.php?image=wolb21hp.jpg
ScifiterX 05:51, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for your input. Now, lets see if that keeps the guy from changing it back. ScifiterX 17:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Actually, yes I did come back and I also did point out that the information provided in those links is anywhere from 12 to 15 years old. Now, I didn't want to get into some squabble like some fanboy, but that seems to have been the way it went. The info in the links occurred prior to the whole storyline where the Adamantium was ripped from his skeleton, his healing powers increasing to higher levels, and before his Origin story. If you're going to use handbook information to prove a point, then it's going to have to be from something that wasn't printed a decade and a half ago. I'm not trying to be a jerk or anything, but I have a valid point. I believe his healing factor operates on a higher level you don't, so we'll just disagree. You can change it, I can always change it back. 206.28.58.33 03:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Normally, when someone isn't trying to be a jerk they don't call people fanboys or engage in condescending dissertations.
- Uhh, ok? I'll leave the technical details to you, ScifiterX. ;) Tzarius 10:51, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
I thought that User:206.28.58.33 was someone else other than yourself. Are you and that user the same person? I'd really like to know. Personally, your idea for the compromise was a good one because in the Ultimate line Wolverine does have a Metahuman regenerative healing factor. ScifiterX 10:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I've always been logged in when I do edits, and my current IP is 125.255.21.46. Tzarius 23:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't accusing you I just thought I might have been misunderstanding you and that you may have been the person who left the remark (206.28.58.33). Only way I could find out was to ask. Like I said I agree with the way you stated it the change in the article.ScifiterX 20:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Edit summaries
[edit]I had to laugh at this one. Well done. :) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]Please do not create nonsense redirects, like "he bite me in my vagina!". Thank you. Melsaran (formerly Salaskаn) 22:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Mass Effect
[edit]Hey. I noticed you're an editor on the Mass Effect page. I'm an admin at the Mass Effect wiki at Wikia, and I wanted to invite you to come check it out and share your knowledge. Cheers. - JoePlay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.64.128.200 (talk) 21:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Lok wallpaper02 1280.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lok wallpaper02 1280.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SilentAria talk 09:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo s powerball.gif
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Logo s powerball.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Long War (21st century)
[edit]I have nominated Long War (21st century), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long War (21st century) (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JokerXtreme (talk) 08:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Did you take part on the Community Health learning campaign at Wikimania?
[edit]Hi Tzarius,
I don't know if we met. My name is María, I am Communications and Outreach coordinator at Learning and Evaluation team at WMF. I am currently uploading the drawings people contributed to the campaign while at Wikimania. ,br>
I was wondering if this drawing here is yours? Please let me know when you can.
Thanks, MCruz (WMF) (talk) 00:47, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- 'Twas not I...
- Tzarius (talk) 08:04, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! María (WMF) (talk) 18:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Tzarius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Tzarius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tzarius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)