Talk:Dusk and Her Embrace

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Black Metal (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Metal, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Black MetalWikipedia:WikiProject Black MetalTemplate:WikiProject Black MetalBlack Metal articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Copies of this album sold

I don't think this album has sold half a million copies. Are there any reliable sources on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.242.4.198 (talk) 22:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Duskandh2.jpg

Image:Duskandh2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

If someone could get some sources in here that would be great. Chipthief00 (talk) 01:18, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Variant covers

Both of these have the correct fair use rationales, and both are mentioned in the actual article, meaning that they're not simply included for decoration. They do not, as far as I can see, violate Wikipedia's non-free content criteria, and their omission is detrimental to the page, since it means significant visual information is missing. They WERE in violation of the thumbnail rule however, so have now been added to the box. If you disagree with this, Cannibaloki, please explain.

Er... and I can't find the tildes on my new keyboard... User: Cardinal Wurzel, 17/5/09, 15:51 GMT.

Very simple, acording with Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria: Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. I do not need all the covers of several different versions which this album was released.--Canniba loki 18:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I actually can read. I just don't agree with your interpretation of the rules. Mentioning that there was a special edition that came in a coffin, and then illustrating that, doesn't seem to me to contravene the guidelines. The normal cover doesn't convey equivalent information, since you can't infer from it what the coffin packaging looked like. But whatever, if you care that strongly, do what you like. I'm not going to get in an edit war about it. Just out of interest, do you actually contribute to articles or just police them randomly? I find that really fascinating. I'm sure there's a PhD in the psychology of Wikipedians. :-) User: Cardinal Wurzel, 21/5/09, 19:39 GMT.

You're right, [This does not mean that you are 100% right.] I will not bother you more with that image stuff.--Canniba loki 06:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 June 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. No opposition after relisting. SST flyer 12:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some prior discussion moved to /Archive 1. SST flyer 12:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dusk... and Her Embrace → Dusk and Her Embrace – I'm opening this on behalf of FamblyCat94, who had requested a page move to Dusk and Her Embrace, which currently serves as a redirect, with the justification "Both MusicBrainz and Discogs treat this album as Dusk and Her Embrace, and Dusk... and Her Embrace is not currently supported by any references". For some reason Wikipedia isn't allowing me to post this with my original post, so I'll make a quick post and then add my response afterwards. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC) -- Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my original post:

I declined this since the CoF website seems to refer to the album with ellipses, at least with the most recent release, Original Sin, and there's evidence of the album being sold under Dusk... per this Amazon listing. Metal Injection also refers to the 1996 album using ellipses.

The biggest argument in favor of the move is that Dusk and Her Embrace seems to be the way that the album is commonly titled by most outlets. (WP:COMMONNAME) That the cover itself generally lacks the title (its first release had no title on the cover from what I can see here) and there are so many different versions of it out there (some with the ellipses, some without, some styling the title as Dusk & Her Embrace, etc).

Why I'm opening this is because I'd like to have some sort of consensus prior to this move, just in case it gets questioned in the future with some of the same stuff that I pulled up. That way it'd be safe from any other potential moves, especially since the cover art for the 2016 version seems to include the ellipses. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any particular opinion on this either way, it's just that there is evidence of this being the title and perhaps the original title style and I'd like to have some sort of consensus just to prevent any potential future moves from the title sans ellipses. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys. Regarding the cover, the title when you're holding the physical CD is to the side under the plastic of the CD tray, and does include the ellipses (not a great photo - but see here http://thumbs.ebaystatic.com/images/g/M6kAAOSwc1FXaHtn/s-l225.jpg). They're also on the black limited edition, of which there's a picture on the page. But they're not on the spine, just to be awkward! Cheers - hope that vaguely helps. Annoyingly I can't check The Gospel of Filth at the moment because I've just moved house and it's in a box in storage. That was where the definitive answer on V Empire vs Vempire came from. Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 11:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! That's actually really helpful! Per WorldCat there aren't any libraries near me that hold the book and there's no Google Books view for it either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dusk and Her Embrace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]